Cover
Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024)

Published: November 15, 2024

Pages: 46-61

Review Paper

A Comprehensive Review of Hybrid Photovoltaic-Thermoelectric Systems for Enhanced Solar Energy Utilization

Huseen Yousif 1 Saad Jalil 2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering of Engineering Faculty, University of Anbar
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Anbar , Anbar, Iraq
History
  • Received: July 8, 2024
  • Revised: October 10, 2024
  • Accepted: November 7, 2024
  • Available Online: December 15, 2024
DOI

https://doi.org/10.37649/aengs.2024.151670.1090

Abstract

These systems show great promise by converting waste heat from photovoltaic modules into additional electrical power. The study analyzes the performance and efficiency of the hybrid PV-TEG systems under varying conditions, such as different solar concentration ratios, cooling methods, and materials. While these innovations promise to improve system efficiency, the review also identifies several challenges, including increased thermal resistance, higher system costs, and the minimal temperature difference across the TEG, which significantly limits its performance. This limitation, where the temperature differential is often too small to be effectively harnessed, reduces the TEG's overall efficiency and hinders the integrated system's potential gains. The review underscores the need for urgent and extensive research to develop optimized design configurations, durable mathematical models, and further experimental validation to ensure the practical viability of these systems under diverse environmental conditions. Despite these challenges, the potential of PV-TEG systems to revolutionize solar energy technologies is undeniable.PV-TEG performance is intricately linked to environmental conditions: higher solar radiation boosts efficiency, but increased ambient temperatures reduce it. TEGs often hinder PV cooling, yielding minimal efficiency gains. Non-uniform heat and low-temperature differences across TEGs further decrease performance. While hybrids can improve power conversion, high costs limit feasibility. However, with strategies such as enhancing solar concentration, using effective cooling methods like water or nanofluids, and advanced materials like phase change materials, the efficiency and reliability of these systems can be significantly improved

Keywords

References

  1. T. Chow, “A review on photovoltaic/thermal hybrid solar technology,” Appl. Energy, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 365–379, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.037.
  2. M. Rodrigo, A. Valera, E. F. Fernández, and F. M. Almonacid, “Performance and economic limits of passively cooled hybrid thermoelectric generator-concentrator photovoltaic modules,” Appl. Energy, vol. 238, no. October 2018, pp. 1150–1162, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.132.
  3. H. Ahmadi et al., “Renewable energy harvesting with the application of nanotechnology: A review,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1387–1410, 2019, doi: 10.1002/er.4282.
  4. Z. Sahin, K. G. Ismaila, B. S. Yilbas, and A. Al-Sharafi, “A review on the performance of photovoltaic/thermoelectric hybrid generators,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 3365–3394, 2020, doi: 10.1002/er.5139.
  5. Yin, Q. Li, and Y. Xuan, “Feasibility analysis of a concentrating photovoltaic-thermoelectric-thermal cogeneration,” Appl. Energy, vol. 236, no. September 2018, pp. 560–573, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.019.
  6. Jena and S. K. Kar, “Demonstrating the benefits of thermoelectric-coupled solar PV system in microgrid challenging conventional integration issues of renewable resources,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 950–976, 2020, doi: 10.1002/er.4953.
  7. Jena and S. K. Kar, “Employment of solar photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator-based hybrid system for efficient operation of hybrid nonconventional distribution generator,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 109–127, 2020, doi: 10.1002/er.4823.
  8. Lu, X. Yu, Q. Wang, Y. Chen, and T. Ma, “Numerical study on nonuniform segmented enhancement method for thermoelectric power generator,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl., vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 605–627, 2019, doi: 10.1080/10407782.2019.1644909.
  9. Teymori-Omran, A. Motevali, S. Reza Mousavi Seyedi, and M. Montazeri, “Numerical simulation and experimental validation of a photovoltaic/thermal system: Performance comparison inside and outside the greenhouse,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 46, no. May, p. 101271, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101271.
  10. He, G. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Ji, G. Li, and X. Zhao, “Recent development and application of thermoelectric generator and cooler,” Appl. Energy, vol. 143, pp. 1–25, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.075.
  11. S. Yousif and S. M. JALIL, “Optimum Load of the Non-Uniform Heat Flux on Thermoelectric Generator (TEG) with Plate-Pin Heat Sink,” Salud, Cienc. y Tecnol. - Ser. Conf., vol. 3, p. 829, 2024, doi: 10.56294/sctconf2024829.
  12. R. Fallah Kohan, M. Eslami, and K. Jafarpur, “A hybrid analytical-computational method for three-dimensional modeling of thermoelectric generators,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 2680–2693, 2021, doi: 10.1002/er.5960.
  13. Singh, O. I. Ibeagwu, and R. Lamba, “Thermodynamic evaluation of irreversibility and optimum performance of a concentrated PV-TEG cogenerated hybrid system,” Sol. Energy, vol. 170, no. June, pp. 896–905, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.034.
  14. Bjørk and K. K. Nielsen, “The performance of a combined solar photovoltaic (PV) and thermoelectric generator (TEG) system,” Sol. Energy, vol. 120, pp. 187–194, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.07.035.
  15. Lamba and S. C. Kaushik, “Modeling and performance analysis of a concentrated photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid power generation system,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 115, pp. 288–298, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.061.
  16. Hashim, J. J. Bomphrey, and G. Min, “Model for geometry optimization of thermoelectric devices in a hybrid PV/TE system,” Renew. Energy, vol. 87, pp. 458–463, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.10.029.
  17. Cui, Y. Xuan, and Q. Li, “Design of a novel concentrating photovoltaic-thermoelectric system incorporated with phase change materials,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 112, pp. 49–60, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.008.
  18. Li, Y. Xuan, Q. Li, and H. Hong, “Exergy and energy analysis of photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid systems,” Energy, vol. 126, pp. 343–351, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.042.
  19. Yin, Q. Li, and Y. Xuan, “Thermal resistance analysis and optimization of the photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid system,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 143, pp. 188–202, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.04.004.
  20. Zhang and Y. Xuan, “Performance improvement of a photovoltaic - Thermoelectric hybrid system subjecting to fluctuant solar radiation,” Renew. Energy, vol. 113, pp. 1551–1558, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.003.
  21. Koushik, S. Das, V. Sharma, P. Walde, and N. Maji, “PV and TEG Hybrid Power Generation for Enhancement of Efficiency,” India Int. Conf. Power Electron. IICPE, vol. 2018-Decem, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1109/IICPE.2018.8709422.
  22. R. Fallah Kohan, F. Lotfipour, and M. Eslami, “Numerical simulation of a photovoltaic thermoelectric hybrid power generation system,” Sol. Energy, vol. 174, no. September, pp. 537–548, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.046.
  23. Kılkış, “Development of a composite PVT panel with PCM embodiment, TEG modules, flat-plate solar collector, and thermally pulsing heat pipes,” Sol. Energy, vol. 200, no. October, pp. 89–107, 2020, doi 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.075.
  24. Salari, A. Parcheforosh, A. Hakkaki-Fard, and A. Amadeh, “A numerical study on a photovoltaic thermal system integrated with a thermoelectric generator module,” Renew. Energy, vol. 153, pp. 1261–1271, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.018.
  25. Lekbir, S. Hassani, S. Mekhilef, R. Saidur, M. R. Ab Ghani, and C. K. Gan, “Energy performance investigation of nanofluid-based concentrated photovoltaic / thermal-thermoelectric generator hybrid system,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 9039–9057, 2021, doi: 10.1002/er.6436.
  26. Song, J. Ji, J. Cai, Z. Li, and Y. Gao, “Performance prediction on a novel solar assisted heat pump with hybrid Fresnel PV plus TEG evaporator,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 210, no. September 2019, p. 112651, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112651.
  27. Wen, J. Ji, Z. Song, Z. Li, H. Xie, and J. Wang, “Comparison analysis of two different concentrated photovoltaic/thermal-TEG hybrid systems,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 234, no. February, p. 113940, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113940.
  28. Tiwari and S. Aggarwal, “Thermal modeling, performance analysis and exergy study of a concentrated semi-transparent photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator (CSPV-TEG) hybrid power generation system,” Int. J. Sustain. Energy, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 947–976, 2021, doi: 10.1080/14786451.2021.1887187.
  29. Naderi, B. M. Ziapour, and M. Y. Gendeshmin, “Improvement of photocells by the integration of phase change materials and thermoelectric generators (PV-PCM-TEG) and study on the ability to generate electricity around the clock,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 36, no. February, p. 102384, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102384.
  30. Ko and J. W. Jeong, “Annual performance evaluation of thermoelectric generator-assisted building-integrated photovoltaic system with phase change material,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 145, no. April, p. 111085, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111085.
  31. Á. Valera, P. M. Rodrigo, F. Almonacid, and E. F. Fernández, “Efficiency improvement of passively cooled micro-scale hybrid CPV-TEG systems at ultra-high concentration levels,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 244, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114521.
  32. A. I. Khan et al., “An Experimental and Comparative Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Photovoltaic-Thermoelectric System,” Front. Energy Res., vol. 9, no. September, pp. 1–9, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2021.722514.
  33. Lorenzi, “Hybrid thermoelectric-photovoltaic generators under negative illumination conditions,” ACS Appl. Energy Mater., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 5381–5387, 2022, doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c02710.
  34. Narducci and B. Lorenzi, “Economic Convenience of Hybrid Thermoelectric-Photovoltaic Solar Harvesters,” ACS Appl. Energy Mater., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 4029–4037, 2021, doi: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00394.
  35. S. Nazri et al., “Analytical and experimental study of hybrid photovoltaic–thermal–thermoelectric systems in sustainable energy generation,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 51, no. September, p. 103522, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103522.
  36. Sheikholeslami and Z. Khalili, “Investigation of a solar photovoltaic-thermoelectric system for building unit in presence of helical tapes and jet impingement of hybrid nanomaterial,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 74, no. May, p. 106871, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106871.
  37. R. Fallah Kohan, M. Eslami, and K. Jafarpur, “Thermal influence of thermoelectric modules on the performance of hybrid PV-TEG systems: Effects of TEG type, arrangement and working condition,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 147, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106969.
  38. . Almarashi et al., “Photovoltaic thermal solar system in presence of nanofluid cooling analyzing environmental parameter in the existence of TEG module,” Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 149, no. 6, pp. 2739–2747, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10973-023-12827-5.
  39. Azizi, Z. Khalili, and M. Sheikholeslami, “Simulation of solar photovoltaic system integrated with TEG in presence of hybrid nanomaterial,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., no. 0123456789, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10973-024-13192-7.
  40. A. Melaibari, N. H. Abu-Hamdeh, A. S. Alorfi, H. A. Z. AL-bonsrulah, and A. M. A. Elsiddieg, “New design for PVT system with elliptic cooling duct involving nanofluid in existence of MHD and utilizing TEG,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 53, no. October 2023, p. 103815, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103815.
  41. Almarashi et al., “Effect of loading Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the electrical performance of solar panel utilizing numerical modeling,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 55, no. February, p. 104165, 2024, doi 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104165.
  42. Azizi, Z. Khalili, and M. Sheikholeslami, “Simulation of the integration of PVT and TEG with a cooling duct filled with nanofluid,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 59, no. February, p. 104504, 2024, doi 10.1016/j.csite.2024.104504.
  43. Bulat, E. Büyükbicakci, and M. Erkovan, “Efficiency Enhancement in Photovoltaic–Thermoelectric Hybrid Systems through Cooling Strategies,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.3390/en17020430.
  44. Sheikholeslami and Z. Khalili, “Energy management of a concentrated photovoltaic−thermal unit utilizing nanofluid jet impingement in the existence of thermoelectric module,” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., vol. 18, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/19942060.2023.2297044.
  45. M. Alajlan, S. Dang, and Q. Gan, “Enhanced nighttime power generation and photovoltaic cooling in photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid systems,” Energy Convers. Manag. X, vol. 22, no. March, p. 100580, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100580.
  46. Darkwa, J. Calautit, D. Du, and G. Kokogianakis, “A numerical and experimental analysis of an integrated TEG-PCM power enhancement system for photovoltaic cells,” Appl. Energy, vol. 248, no. January, pp. 688–701, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.147.
  47. Yin, Q. Li, and Y. Xuan, “Feasibility analysis of a tandem photovoltaic-thermoelectric hybrid system under solar concentration,” Renew. Energy, vol. 162, pp. 1828–1841, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.006.
  48. Ruzaimi et al., “Performance analysis of thermoelectric generator implemented on non-uniform heat distribution of photovoltaic module,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 2379–2387, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.029.
  49. Kidegho, F. Njoka, C. Muriithi, and R. Kinyua, “Evaluation of thermal interface materials in mediating PV cell temperature mismatch in PV–TEG power generation,” Energy Reports, vol. 7, pp. 1636–1650, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.015.
  50. Gholami, M. H. Rahmati, A. Arabhosseini, and M. Gharzi, “Combined cooling of photovoltaic module integrated with thermoelectric generators, by using earthenware water tank and ultrasonic humidifier: An experimental study,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 53, no. October 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102601.
  51. S. Nazri et al., “Analytical and experimental study of hybrid photovoltaic–thermal–thermoelectric systems in sustainable energy generation,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 51, no. September, p. 103522, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103522.
  52. Gopinath and R. Marimuthu, “PV-TEG output: Comparison with heat sink and graphite sheet as heat dissipators,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 45, no. March, p. 102935, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.102935.
  53. Praveenkumar, E. B. Agyekum, A. Kumar, and V. I. Velkin, “Thermo-enviro-economic analysis of solar photovoltaic/thermal system incorporated with u-shaped grid copper pipe, thermal electric generators, and nanofluids: An experimental investigation,” J. Energy Storage, vol. 60, no. September 2022, p. 106611, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.106611.
  54. Gopinath and R. Marimuthu, “Experimental study of photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator with graphite sheet,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 54, no. December 2023, p. 103982, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2024.103982.