Authors
Department of Production Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq
,
Document Type : Research Paper
Abstract
Turning is the most popular machining operation. The quality of the product may be determined using a variety of metrics, such as the surface generation method and the surface roughness of the product. This work uses cutting variables to obtain the best surface quality through a mathematical model. The suggested surface generation in this work results from deriving it using the Bezier technique, with degree (5th) having six chosen control points. One of the critical indicators of the quality of machined components is the surface roughness created during the machining process. Surface roughness improvement via machining process parameter optimization has been extensively researched. The Taguchi Method and actual tests were employed for evaluating the surface quality of complicated forms; regression models with three different variables for the cutting process, such as cutting speed, depth of cut, and feed rate, were also used. According to the experimental findings, the most significant effect of feed rate on the surface roughness is approximately (40.9%), and the more minor effect of depth of cut on the surface roughness is almost (16.23%). In addition, the average percentage error is 4.93%, the maximum error is 0.14 mm, and the minimum error is -0.143 mm for the prediction using the regression equation.
- B. Huang, R. Rohmat, R. Sukwadi, ”The development of an ANN surface roughness prediction system of multiple materials in CNC turning”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology; 125: 1-19, 2023.
- H. Kashkool, ”Optimization of Machining Parameters of AISI 1045 Steel for Better Surface Finish and Tool Life Using TiN Coated Carbide Insert”, Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences; 29 (2):1-6,2022. https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.29.2.1
- S. Vishal, T.K. Gupta, A.K. Srivastava, S. Chauhan, P.K. Chauhan, “Effects of cutting parameters on aluminium alloys-A review”, Mater. Today Proc. 47 (13) 3823–3827, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.546
- Z. Basha, G Mahesh, M. Muthuprakash. “Optimization of CNC Turning Process Parameters on Aluminum 6061Using Genetic Algorithm”, International Journal of Science and Modern Engineering; 1 (9): PP43-46, 2013.
- Sonar, V. Saxena, V. Kshirsagar , S. P. Deshpande. , ”Process Parameters Opt. imization Of CNC Turning Machine For Aluminium Alloy Using Taguchi Method”, International Journal of Research in EngineeringandTechnology;5(04):pp.36-39,2016 .https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.546.
- N. Akhtar, T. Sathish, V. Mohanavel, A. Afzal, A. Arul ,M. Ravichandran, I. Abd Rahim, S. S. Alhady, E. A. Bakar ,B. Saleh.,” Optimization of process parameters in CNC turning of aluminum 7075 alloy using L27 array-based Taguchi method”, Materials; 14: 44-70.,2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133970.
- Hidayat, N. A. Mahbubah, M. Nuruddin, S. S. Dahda, D. Andesta, E. Ismiyah, D. Widyaningrum, M. Z. Fathoni, M. D. Kurniawan, A. W. Rizqi, E. D. Priata “Optimization of CNC Turning Parameters for cutting Al6061 to Achieve Good Surface Roughness Based on Taguchi Method”.
- H. Faisal, A. Mohana Krishnan, S. Prabagaran, R. Venkatesh d YP, “Optimization and prediction of CBN tool life sustainability duringAA1100 CNC turning by response surface methodology”, Journal of Heliyon, 2023.
- Verma, K. Sharad . Pradhan., “Experimental and numerical investigations in CNC turning for differentcombinations of tool inserts and workpiece material”, Materials Today: Proceedings,2020.
- Gupta, H. Singh, A. Aggarwal, “Taguchi fuzzy multi-output optimization (MOO) in high-speed CNC turning of AISI P-20 tool steel”, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (6) 6822–6828, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.113.
- H. Aghdeab, L. A. Mohammed, A. M. Ubaid, “Optimization of CNC turning for aluminium alloy using simulated annealing method”, Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 9 (1) 39–44, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jijme.2014.11.002.
- Oberle, S. Schorr, L. Yi, M. Glatt, D. Bahre, J.C. Aurich, “A use case to implement machine learning for lifetime prediction of manufacturing tool”, Proc. CIRP 93 :1481–1489, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.060.
- Elangovan, S. B. Devasenapati, N. R. Sakthivel, K.I. Ramachandran, “Evaluation of expert system for condition monitoring of a single point cutting tool using principle component analysis and decision tree algorithm”, Expert Syst. Appl. 38 (4) 4450–4459,2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.053.
- E. Breen, “Curves and Surfaces for Computer Graphics”. 6th, Springer Science and Business Media; Inc2007.
- Dutta , S. K. Narala, “Optimizing turning parameters in the machining of AM alloy using Taguchi methodology”, Measurement 2021; 169: 108340.
- S Krar , A Gill , “Computer Numerical Control Programmig Basics”, New York; 1999.
- G E Thyer , “Computer Numerical Control of machine tools”, 2cd, Elsevier; 1991.
- Feng, X. Wang,”Surface roughness predictive modeling: neural networks versus regression”’ IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing 2003; 35 (1): 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1531524
- H. Abdulridha , A. J. Helael, A. A. Al-duroobi, “Prediction the Influence of Machining Parameters for CNC Turning of Aluminum Alloy Using RSM and ANN”, Engineering and Technology Journal; 38(6): 887-895., 2020. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v38i6A.659
- M. Abbas, A. A. Khleif , “The Influence of Angled Electrodes on Various Characteristics in EDM Process-Review Article”, Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences ; 30. (2): 1-9, 2023. https://doi.org/10.24237/tjes.202302.355
- Chen , M. C. Uribe , E. E. Kwon , K. Kun ,Y. Park , L. Ding ,L. H. Saw , “A comprehensive review of thermoelectric generation optimization by statistical approach: Taguchi method, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and response surface methodology (RSM)”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews ; 169: 112917,2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112917
- Hasegawa , A. Seireg, R. A. Lindberg , “Surface roughness model for turning”, Tribology International, Elsevier; 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-2678(76)90044-5 .
-